Қазақ ұлттық қыздар педагогикалық университеті / Казахский национальный женский педагогический университет

Постоянный URI для этого сообществаhttps://cris.qyzpu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/1

Просмотр

Фильтры

2025 - 20262

Настройки

Язык: search.filters.language.АнглийскийТема: search.filters.subject.AI literacy

Результаты поиска

Показано: 1 - 2 из 2
  • Загрузка...
    Изображение-миниатюра
    Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашими 
    настройками согласия
    Тип записи:Публикация,
    Human-AI collaboration in the analysis of literary narratives:a new pedagogical paradigm
    (International University of Sarajevo, 2025-10-22)
    Roza Sabdaliyeva
    ;
    Gibadat Orynkhanova
    ;
    Karlygash Abildayeva
    ;
    Lazzat Adilbekova
    ;
    Kulmanat Auyelkhan
    The digitization of education in Kazakhstan has demonstrated the importance of using AI in the teaching of literature. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness of collaboration between humans and AI in improving students' analytical and interpretive skills when studying literary narratives in the context of higher education. The study applied a true experimental design with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a pre-test/post-test control group structure. A voluntary purposeful sample (40 participants in total) with elements of randomization was used (all participants were randomly divided into two groups).The results showed that the t-test results indicated the importance of using ChatGPT, as it showed a statistically significant improvement in literary analysis skills among students. There is also a high level of positive perception of learning using AI elements. This indicates the effective introduction of AI technologies as an important factor in increasing student motivation and engagement. The main challenges to the further integration of AI systems into literary education are technical unpreparedness, further integration of AI systems into literary education are technical unpreparedness, lack of experience and skills in interacting with special programs. The advantages of using AI include the formation of individual educational trajectories, increased access to information sources, interactivity and support. The conclusions emphasize the importance of scaling up the study to obtain new empirical data.
  • Загрузка...
    Изображение-миниатюра
    Некоторые метрики заблокированы вашими 
    настройками согласия
    Тип записи:Публикация,
    Information competence and critical thinking in digital environments evidence from university students in Kazakhstan
    (Frontiers Media, 2026-04-24)
    Nurgul Yrymbayeva
    ;
    Moldir Yermekova
    ;
    Oryntay Tezekova
    ;
    Bakytgul B. Issatayeva
    ;
    Akgul Zhubandykova
    The rapid expansion of digital platforms and generative artificial intelligence has reshaped how university students access and evaluate academic information, intensifying concerns about information reliability, critical thinking, and ethical use. This study addresses the gap between students’ widespread access to digital information and their capacity to critically evaluate and responsibly use it in academic contexts, particularly in underrepresented settings such as Kazakhstan. A sequential mixed-methods design (QUAL → quan) was employed. Qualitative data explored students’ information-seeking practices, credibility judgments, responses to conflicting information, perceptions of AI-related risks, and views on institutional support. The sample consisted of 77 undergraduate students enrolled in teacher education-related programs at a university in Kazakhstan. The findings showed a clear hierarchy of search entry points: students most often began with Google Search ( n = 30), followed by university databases/library portals ( n = 16) and AI tools ( n = 15). Clear author credentials ( n = 49) and transparent methods or data ( n = 25) emerged as the strongest trust indicators. When using AI, students reported predominantly supportive uses, especially summarizing checked readings ( n = 58) and generating ideas or outlines ( n = 52), rather than relying on AI as a primary source. These patterns indicate that students’ engagement with generative AI is characterized by conditional trust, pragmatic usefulness, and uneven but developing evaluative awareness. The study contributes context-specific evidence from Kazakhstan to the emerging literature on student engagement with generative AI and suggests that higher education institutions should integrate source evaluation, critical reasoning, and AI literacy more explicitly into curriculum, pedagogy, and library support systems.
    Цитирования (OpenAlex) 2